| |
Housing: Who Wants to Catch the Falling Knife? Charles Hugh Smith  The stock market is home to many trenchant phrases--the trend is your friend, sell in May,
go away, among many--but one is particularly relevant now to the housing market: Catching
the Falling Knife.
The phrase perfectly captures the dangers of buying into a declining market. To do so is
like trying to catch a falling knife: the momentum is all down, and we all know what happens
to those who grasp a razor-sharp blade in mid-air.
In the stock market, the expression is a warning: it isn't safe to buy until the knife has
fallen to earth, i.e. the market has finally hit bottom. Now that the housing market has
rolled over and is in decline, the same is true for this bubblicious market.
At the risk of preaching to the choir, let's review the evidence that housing
has finally slipped off the precipice and is starting its long freefall:
The ratio between rents and prices--what a house rents for compared to what
it fetches when sold--is at historically unsustainable levels. This graph says it all:
a hockey-stick rise in values which far outstrips the income potential of the property. At
these levels, housing makes no sense as an investment; it only makes sense as a speculation
if the mania continues. Alas, no mania lasts forever. so read on:
The market is running out of new buyers. Affordability is at all-time lows, and
the pool of those able to buy into an inflated market, even with interest-only loans, is
exhausted. As reported in The Wall Street Journal,
New-Home Sales Tumble 10.5%. A sure sign that supply is overwhelming
demand is rising inventory, and the sharp rise in the number of homes for sale has been
noted virtually everywhere.
Household debt has reached historical highs. Now that interest rates have turned
upward, the likelihood of the average American family increasing its debt load is basically
nil. The stupendous levels of debt Americans already carry will only cost more to service
in the months and years ahead.
The low-rate ARMs which have supported the bubble are falling from favor.
Dataquick Information Systems reported that the percentage of California home buyers who
took on an adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) dropped from 71% in November to 52% in February.
People are realizing that ARMs are a trap for the unwary, as future "resets"
are sure to be much higher than the ARM rate.
Absurdly lax lending policies are still in force, but the tightening has begun.
HomeSmartReports.com announced that "slam dunk" loans, that is, those approved with virtually
no scrutiny, dropped from 84% all the way to 79%. Whoopie! Not much of a drop, but it is a
telltale sign of more scrutiny to come of the marginal buyers and speculators who have been
pumping up the bubble.
For an understanding of how the Federal Reserve can tighten lending in a "stealth mode"
unknown to the average American (including me, until I read this), please read
The Fed Officially Kicks Off the Next Recession. This is fascinating
reading--a real insider's view of how the Fed can undetectably constrict lending.
Lenders are getting squeezed in other more visible ways as well, as The Wall Street Journal
reported on March 27:
Housing Banks May Be Forced To Cut Dividends:
"A crackdown by regulators of the Federal Home Loan Banks threatens to shrink a subsidy long
enjoyed by thousands of lenders, including giants such as Washington Mutual Inc. and
Citigroup Inc."
Forclosures are rising. According to the Dallas News,
smaller mortgages are falling into foreclosures, even as sales of high-end
houses continues apace. The conclusion: "In a healthy local housing market,
a sign of trouble has appeared: More people are losing their homes to foreclosure than at
any time since the Texas real estate bust of the 1980s. Residential foreclosures jumped
30 percent from a year ago in North Texas."
Bond yields--
and thus mortgage rates--are on the rise. The corporate cheerleaders
over at BusinessWeek are actually applauding the rise of the long bond,
bond yields are rising--and it's about time, for they know all too
well that interest rates in the U.S. are now completely dependent on foreign buyers of
U.S. Treasuries. If nobody buys the Treasury's massive auctions of U.S. debt, then interest
rates have to go up to entice wary buyers to buy Treasuries rather than Eurobonds. As bond
yields rise throughout the world, U.S. rates have to rise, too, lest everyone abandon the
dollar and the U.S. bond market.
As this chart reveals, the problem is that bond-yield cycles last about 20 years. Just as
interest rates and bond yields dropped for 22 years, historical evidence suggests they will
rise for the next 20 years. Since housing become increasingly unaffordable as interest
rates rise, exactly when will the knife hit the hard dirt of a real bottom? If you consider
the last housing top occurred in 1990, and late 2005 appears to be the top of this cycle,
you'd have to guess between five and ten years in the future--or maybe even 20 years hence.
So who's still willing to try their luck at catching the falling knife in housing?
More on that tomorrow.
March 29, 2006
Charles Hugh Smith
Weblog and wEssays
www.oftwominds.com/blog.html
Email this Article to a Friend 
| |
Printer Friendly Version