Please Note: The author is not a registered securities advisor
Please read the Disclaimer below if you have not already done so
Excerpt from: The December 2005 Issue of EGS
The word's getting out: Gold is Good
Investors Pulled and Pushed to gold as
mainstream commentators embrace gold bug truisms
Louis Paquette
Last issue, I marked the Five Year anniversary of the Bull Market in Gold and gold Stocks,
suggesting how their stellar performance over the major U.S. stock indices was liable to impact
people's perception about gold. Well, the most amazing transformation has taken place since then
- financial mainstream media commentators have suddenly jumped all over the gold sector. Don't
underestimate the importance of this sudden conversion. These commentators have huge
influence to reach the masses that are not yet converted; they haven't even heard the story yet.
But they will now.
So far the bull market has been driven by the gold bugs themselves and a trickle of converts
along the way. For the first time though, I suppose because gold was approaching $500 and
outperforming Wall Street for Five years running now, mainstream influential media
commentators are converting and talking about gold in very bullish ways.
For example, CNBC's Larry Kudlow has never been a fan of gold. In fact he loathes higher
gold prices, considering this a "negative indicator" for the good 'ole American economy and free
enterprise system. And while he didn't quite convert the other day when he had John Hathaway
(Toqueville Gold Fund) on a panel to discuss gold and metals, Larry certainly sounded open to
suggestion. John calmly listed just a couple of the standard reasons for higher gold prices, reasons gold investors have been familiar with for years, but until very recently, completely foreign to
mainstreamers. By the end of the session, Larry and another panelist were asking how to
participate! All resistance had fallen!
Or how about CNBC's Jim Cramer? Yes, and I do mean, until very recently at least,
"Commodities are DEAD!!" Cramer. Pierre Lassonde's not the only one calling for gold prices
to reach $1,000 these days. Cramer is now also suggesting gold is on its way to four figures in his
article dated October 10, The Gold Parachute in the New York Magazine (excerpt posted at
www.Goldline.com).
Then there's Kevin O'Leary, host of "Squeezeplay" on RobTV. I listen more for Kevin's non-
PC political views (consider him the "Don Cherry of finance") more than his financial interests,
as he's more focused on the mainstream/large-cap area. He's cagey though and like my previous
two examples, he has also never shown the slightest interest in gold. However, in just the past few
weeks, Kevin must have seen the light. While adverse to specific company risk and trying to
evaluate the individual company stocks, (besides bell weather, Newmont) he's suggesting
GLD.NYSE to his audience, the bullion ETF that trades in New York. He says, that with only
1% in of one's assets into gold, a person should still be worried. But with 5%, people can sleep
soundly at night! This really must have put the zap into people, because that same week, I heard
numerous individual investors expressing that very sentiment - the strong desire, even a sense of
urgency, to own the physical metal.
It's amazing to hear commentators embracing the very same truths that the hard-core gold bugs
have been claiming for years. Like the concern over too many U.S. Dollars in foreign hands.
Where were these guys all these years, when gold was priced at $255, or $300? The information
was around. Nothing really has changed. What's different, is that these things are finally getting
noticed and acknowledged.
What's happening is - while these guys don't quite understand why it's happening, like I said in
the last Issue, with the gold sector outperforming stocks FIVE YEARS running now, they just
can't keep looking the other way any longer. They finally recognize a good thing when they see it
and don't want to be left at the station any longer. This is a prime example of one of my favorite
truisms of all - three simple words that explain more about how an asset is priced than almost
anything else: "Perception is Everything." And a sea change in perception about how gold is
viewed by the masses is now under way, courtesy of the mainstream media.
Does this mean it's over?
Now that the mainstream is beginning to embrace gold, does this mean the gold bull market is
nearing an end? After all, the last big thing, the Internet Bubble, lasted roughly as long as the gold
bull market before it collapsed, about five or six years now.
I would suggest, no, for a couple of reasons. For one, commodity bull markets tend to run for
15 to 20 years and I can see no reason for it to be different this time. Especially with what's
happening in India and China.
Second, just because financial types have started talking about gold, hardly means people are
instantly converted and invested. Long standing beliefs formed by the twenty-year bear market in
precious metals and commodities in general from 1980 to 2000 will take years to change. The
latest generation of investors (especially in the West) has little to no concept of gold as an
investment or currency, or of really bad times or currency debasement. These are foreign
concepts that only the most open minded and perceptive will catch on to immediately. The
process will take some time and none of the signs of a secular bull market top are present quite
yet. When we start noticing How to Get Rick with Gold seminars being advertised on a daily
basis, like we are seeing in the Real Estate sector today, then you'll know that the ultimate top is
much closer at hand.
Pull and Push
There are actually two things happening to investors with regard to their perception of gold as a
financial asset class. They are being Pulled toward gold, by its fifth straight year of above
average gains, by its relative performance over other asset classes, by breaching the $500 mark,
and now by the mainstream financial media, among other things. At the same time, they are being
Pushed away from more traditional investments, first by very low returns on fixed income
investments, secondly, by the growing realization that some pretty serious problems lie ahead. Of
course these are hard to imagine given all the goldilocks-economy statistics that have been
released lately. But listen to the likes of Alan Greenspan - warning in very plain language that the
consequences of doing nothing about the U.S. current account deficits and the looming
pension/health care demographic crises will be serious. Then we have the comptroller general of
the United States running around the country explaining "…how the nation's finances are going
to hell." and how the country's business model is "broken" in a USA Today article dated November 14 entitled: A 'fiscal hurricane' on the horizon'. (Link to this is on our site if you
haven't read it, you should).
- "We face a demographic tsunami" that "will never recede," David Walker tells a group
of reporters. He runs through a long list of fiscal challenges, led by the imminent
retirement of the baby boomers, whose promised Medicare and Social Security benefits
will swamp the federal budget in coming decades."
- "To hear Walker, the nation's top auditor, tell it, the United States can be likened to
Rome before the fall of the empire. Its financial condition is "worse than advertised," he
says. It has a "broken business model." It faces deficits in its budget, its balance of
payments, its savings - and its leadership."
The difference between what we are now hearing from these people today and past gloom and
dommers isn't the message, just the messengers. Previous gloom and doomers were selling
products; their books, newsletters or gold coins. They were seen as possibly biased toward their
bleak views. The new messengers do not have apparent reasons to benefit from raising awareness
about these stark scenarios. Not only that, but they are from the "inside" - they know where
things are headed. The new messengers carry more weight, this story is gradually getting out and
it's spooking people into looking for alternative investments. And gold fits the bill perfectly.
This Issue we update our seasonal strategy by attempting to answer the difficult question: "Seasonal High, or
Perfect Storm?" And while the best time to buy all the gold stocks was in May through August before the big run-up
in the gold price (as this letter clearly started pointing out starting in April) due to high demand, I have been
searching for quality juniors searching for gold which haven't moved up too much in price and I feature two new
ones this issue.
(Full versions of the December Issue are available for purchase at: www.EmergingGrowthStocks.ca)
Louis Paquette,
Publisher
www.EmergingGrowthStocks.ca
EGS Copyright 2005
DISCLAIMER -Louis Paquette`s Emerging Growth Stocks is an independent publication committed to providing an objective analysis of the markets, focusing on the TSX-Venture Exchange and individual companies with substantial upside potential over the next six to twelve months. The information contained herein is believed to be accurate but this cannot be guaranteed. The analysis does not purport to be a complete study of securities mentioned herein, and readers are advised to discuss any related purchase or sale decisions with a registered securities broker. Companies featured in EGS are often at very early stages of development and can therefore subject to business failure, and are to be considered speculative and high risk in nature. Reports herein are for information purposes and are not solicitations to buy or sell any of the securities mentioned. The author may or may not hold a position (long or short) in the securities mentioned herein. This publication may not be reproduced without the expressed prior consent of the author. The author is not a registered securities advisor, and opinions expressed should not be considered as investment advice to buy or sell securities, but rather the author's opinion only.
Email this Article to a Friend 
Printer Friendly Version